Search
  • Papers


Geodetic Control Methods of RT-32, RT-13 Radio Telescopes Mirror Systems

A. O. Shamov

Transactions of IAA RAS, issue 70, 13–18 (2024)

DOI: 10.32876/ApplAstron.70.13-18

Keywords: mirror systems of radio telescopes contact method of measurement, step-by-step scanning method, photogrammetric method of measurement, standard deviation of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the RT, cartograms of deviations

About the paper Full text

Abstract

The mirror systems of the RT-32 and RT-13 radio telescopes consist of two main elements: the main mirror (reflector) and the secondary mirror (subreflector). It is the quality of their execution that to some extent determines the accuracy of VLBI observational data. Thus, there is a need to carry out research on the assessment of the surface geometric parameters of the radio telescopes (RT) mirror systems, which are part of the radio astronomy observatories of the Quasar-KVO complex. While carrying out this task, various methods of geodetic control were applied as being part of the reflective surface modernization of the RT-32 subreflector, the contact method and the method of step-by-step surface scanning were utilized. Furthermore, to assess the accuracy of the reflecting RT-32 subreflector surface, a photogrammetric research method was employed, which was subsequently used in measurements of the RT-13 mirror system. As a сconsequence, the most suitable method for geodetic control of RT-32, RT-13 radio telescopes turned to be the photogrammetric method of research, which, to a great extent, seems to be due to high accuracy of the result obtained in outdoor conditions. However, it is worth noting that in the case of increasing the accuracy of reflectorless laser systems, it is the step-by-step scanning method that becomes the most suitable for performing these types of work. The control measurements showed that the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the SR RT-32 in the observatories: “Svetloe”, “Zelenchukskaya”, “Badary” proved to be 0.34, 0.38 and 0.31 mm, respectively, while the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the RT-13 in the “Svetloe” observatory are 0.19 mm for reflector, 0.18 mm for subreflector.

Citation

Text
BibTeX
RIS
A. O. Shamov. Geodetic Control Methods of RT-32, RT-13 Radio Telescopes Mirror Systems // Transactions of IAA RAS. — 2024. — Issue 70. — P. 13–18. @article{shamov2024, abstract = {The mirror systems of the RT-32 and RT-13 radio telescopes consist of two main elements: the main mirror (reflector) and the secondary mirror (subreflector). It is the quality of their execution that to some extent determines the accuracy of VLBI observational data. Thus, there is a need to carry out research on the assessment of the surface geometric parameters of the radio telescopes (RT) mirror systems, which are part of the radio astronomy observatories of the Quasar-KVO complex. While carrying out this task, various methods of geodetic control were applied as being part of the reflective surface modernization of the RT-32 subreflector, the contact method and the method of step-by-step surface scanning were utilized. Furthermore, to assess the accuracy of the reflecting RT-32 subreflector surface, a photogrammetric research method was employed, which was subsequently used in measurements of the RT-13 mirror system. As a сconsequence, the most suitable method for geodetic control of RT-32, RT-13 radio telescopes turned to be the photogrammetric method of research, which, to a great extent, seems to be due to high accuracy of the result obtained in outdoor conditions. However, it is worth noting that in the case of increasing the accuracy of reflectorless laser systems, it is the step-by-step scanning method that becomes the most suitable for performing these types of work. The control measurements showed that the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the SR RT-32 in the observatories: “Svetloe”, “Zelenchukskaya”, “Badary” proved to be 0.34, 0.38 and 0.31 mm, respectively, while the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the RT-13 in the “Svetloe” observatory are 0.19 mm for reflector, 0.18 mm for subreflector.}, author = {A.~O. Shamov}, doi = {10.32876/ApplAstron.70.13-18}, issue = {70}, journal = {Transactions of IAA RAS}, keyword = {mirror systems of radio telescopes contact method of measurement, step-by-step scanning method, photogrammetric method of measurement, standard deviation of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the RT, cartograms of deviations}, pages = {13--18}, title = {Geodetic Control Methods of RT-32, RT-13 Radio Telescopes Mirror Systems}, url = {http://iaaras.ru/en/library/paper/2191/}, year = {2024} } TY - JOUR TI - Geodetic Control Methods of RT-32, RT-13 Radio Telescopes Mirror Systems AU - Shamov, A. O. PY - 2024 T2 - Transactions of IAA RAS IS - 70 SP - 13 AB - The mirror systems of the RT-32 and RT-13 radio telescopes consist of two main elements: the main mirror (reflector) and the secondary mirror (subreflector). It is the quality of their execution that to some extent determines the accuracy of VLBI observational data. Thus, there is a need to carry out research on the assessment of the surface geometric parameters of the radio telescopes (RT) mirror systems, which are part of the radio astronomy observatories of the Quasar-KVO complex. While carrying out this task, various methods of geodetic control were applied as being part of the reflective surface modernization of the RT-32 subreflector, the contact method and the method of step-by-step surface scanning were utilized. Furthermore, to assess the accuracy of the reflecting RT-32 subreflector surface, a photogrammetric research method was employed, which was subsequently used in measurements of the RT-13 mirror system. As a сconsequence, the most suitable method for geodetic control of RT-32, RT-13 radio telescopes turned to be the photogrammetric method of research, which, to a great extent, seems to be due to high accuracy of the result obtained in outdoor conditions. However, it is worth noting that in the case of increasing the accuracy of reflectorless laser systems, it is the step-by-step scanning method that becomes the most suitable for performing these types of work. The control measurements showed that the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the SR RT-32 in the observatories: “Svetloe”, “Zelenchukskaya”, “Badary” proved to be 0.34, 0.38 and 0.31 mm, respectively, while the RMS of the geometry of the reflecting surface of the RT-13 in the “Svetloe” observatory are 0.19 mm for reflector, 0.18 mm for subreflector. DO - 10.32876/ApplAstron.70.13-18 UR - http://iaaras.ru/en/library/paper/2191/ ER -